<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Keeping our Relationships Fresh and Nourishing:The Creator and Destroyer in Our Relationships.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wellbeingandhealth.net/relationships/136/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wellbeingandhealth.net/relationships/136/</link>
	<description>All aspects of wellbeing and health</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 21:39:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan</title>
		<link>http://wellbeingandhealth.net/relationships/136/comment-page-1/#comment-3689</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 20:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wellbeingandhealth.net/relationships/136/#comment-3689</guid>
		<description>Hi Barbara, it sounds like you&#039;re going through a really rough time.  Finding we&#039;ve been deluded is really difficult, and getting to know our destroyer can be hard too.  I hope you have the support you need to deal with this stuff, please feel free to get in touch if you think I can help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Barbara, it sounds like you&#8217;re going through a really rough time.  Finding we&#8217;ve been deluded is really difficult, and getting to know our destroyer can be hard too.  I hope you have the support you need to deal with this stuff, please feel free to get in touch if you think I can help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara</title>
		<link>http://wellbeingandhealth.net/relationships/136/comment-page-1/#comment-3688</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 18:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wellbeingandhealth.net/relationships/136/#comment-3688</guid>
		<description>Evan, 

I think I&#039;m reading this article for the first time.  I thought I had back read all your articles, but I guess not.  Or maybe I just couldn&#039;t hear this until the situation appeared in my life  once again. Living it over the last several weeks, including yesterday.

I did think I had the destroyer under some sort of conscious control, only to find what I can now only describe as delusion, reappearance or yet another underneath layer I had no consciousness about. Not really clear on which yet or maybe all of those things.  

Very timely post, which I&#039;m presuming is not only necessary for me but also synchroncity at work.  Thanks, as hard as that is to say, probably as hard as this time period and knowledge is to deal with.

PS  The words I&#039;ve been using instead of cruelty are hostile and sadistic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evan, </p>
<p>I think I&#8217;m reading this article for the first time.  I thought I had back read all your articles, but I guess not.  Or maybe I just couldn&#8217;t hear this until the situation appeared in my life  once again. Living it over the last several weeks, including yesterday.</p>
<p>I did think I had the destroyer under some sort of conscious control, only to find what I can now only describe as delusion, reappearance or yet another underneath layer I had no consciousness about. Not really clear on which yet or maybe all of those things.  </p>
<p>Very timely post, which I&#8217;m presuming is not only necessary for me but also synchroncity at work.  Thanks, as hard as that is to say, probably as hard as this time period and knowledge is to deal with.</p>
<p>PS  The words I&#8217;ve been using instead of cruelty are hostile and sadistic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan Hadkins</title>
		<link>http://wellbeingandhealth.net/relationships/136/comment-page-1/#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan Hadkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 22:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wellbeingandhealth.net/relationships/136/#comment-161</guid>
		<description>A Freudian mis-reading if not slip?

I think what happens is that these comments are moments of real contact that break out of the usual habits.  They feel good because they deliver real contact.  The only problem comes to my way of thinking when they are the only (or main) way of making real contact.

Evan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Freudian mis-reading if not slip?</p>
<p>I think what happens is that these comments are moments of real contact that break out of the usual habits.  They feel good because they deliver real contact.  The only problem comes to my way of thinking when they are the only (or main) way of making real contact.</p>
<p>Evan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrSteve</title>
		<link>http://wellbeingandhealth.net/relationships/136/comment-page-1/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator>DrSteve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 19:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wellbeingandhealth.net/relationships/136/#comment-155</guid>
		<description>Evan - your approach to the sexual in relationships makes good sense to me. 
Just to clarify, though. When I spoke of &quot;hot&quot; relationships and said that &quot;partners will ‘bite’ each other now and then&quot; I was not thinking about sex per se (though I can see why you&#039;d think that and it certainly includes sex). I was thinking of things even like the biting comment - something that causes friction and thus heat. A bit of this can be like a spinkle of chili (I&#039;m mixing metaphors) - a lot is too much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evan &#8211; your approach to the sexual in relationships makes good sense to me.<br />
Just to clarify, though. When I spoke of &#8220;hot&#8221; relationships and said that &#8220;partners will ‘bite’ each other now and then&#8221; I was not thinking about sex per se (though I can see why you&#8217;d think that and it certainly includes sex). I was thinking of things even like the biting comment &#8211; something that causes friction and thus heat. A bit of this can be like a spinkle of chili (I&#8217;m mixing metaphors) &#8211; a lot is too much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan Hadkins</title>
		<link>http://wellbeingandhealth.net/relationships/136/comment-page-1/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan Hadkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 23:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wellbeingandhealth.net/relationships/136/#comment-154</guid>
		<description>Hi,

I think I&#039;m getting the photos figured out, thanks.

Yes, I&#039;d avoid the word cruelty but I&#039;m not sure what the right word is.

I avoid telling adults what is right and wrong in the bedroom (so long as consent is mutual)but do have concerns.    I prefer to set out what I regard as desirable and ask people if they want to move toward this.

One difference between &#039;rougher play&#039; and cruelty is that the intention is for the partners pleasure.  So, if the intention is for the lover&#039;s pleasure a refusal won&#039;t offend.  If the refusal does offend there is room for exploring why I want to hurt the one I love - what are the buried resentments and so on.

With role playing and such things.  What we long for is genuine encounter in a safe environment (as a therapist called Alexander Lowen said: contact while remaining intact).  The role playing and such are I think usually safe ways to try out different ways of bringing different parts of ourselves and new behaviour into our relationship.  The goal as I see it is to bring these into our relationship and lives more generally.  If people get stuck in roles and games the question is: what are they afraid of?  We may decide not to confront our fears of course (after all why should we if we don&#039;t want to?).  We may find that as we bring in more parts of ourselves to our relationships that they deepen and are more mutually satisfying.

Thanks for your comments.  They are certainly getting me thinking.  I hope my response makes sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I think I&#8217;m getting the photos figured out, thanks.</p>
<p>Yes, I&#8217;d avoid the word cruelty but I&#8217;m not sure what the right word is.</p>
<p>I avoid telling adults what is right and wrong in the bedroom (so long as consent is mutual)but do have concerns.    I prefer to set out what I regard as desirable and ask people if they want to move toward this.</p>
<p>One difference between &#8216;rougher play&#8217; and cruelty is that the intention is for the partners pleasure.  So, if the intention is for the lover&#8217;s pleasure a refusal won&#8217;t offend.  If the refusal does offend there is room for exploring why I want to hurt the one I love &#8211; what are the buried resentments and so on.</p>
<p>With role playing and such things.  What we long for is genuine encounter in a safe environment (as a therapist called Alexander Lowen said: contact while remaining intact).  The role playing and such are I think usually safe ways to try out different ways of bringing different parts of ourselves and new behaviour into our relationship.  The goal as I see it is to bring these into our relationship and lives more generally.  If people get stuck in roles and games the question is: what are they afraid of?  We may decide not to confront our fears of course (after all why should we if we don&#8217;t want to?).  We may find that as we bring in more parts of ourselves to our relationships that they deepen and are more mutually satisfying.</p>
<p>Thanks for your comments.  They are certainly getting me thinking.  I hope my response makes sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrSteve</title>
		<link>http://wellbeingandhealth.net/relationships/136/comment-page-1/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>DrSteve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 06:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wellbeingandhealth.net/relationships/136/#comment-153</guid>
		<description>(Are the photos working out OK?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Are the photos working out OK?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrSteve</title>
		<link>http://wellbeingandhealth.net/relationships/136/comment-page-1/#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>DrSteve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 06:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wellbeingandhealth.net/relationships/136/#comment-152</guid>
		<description>Evan - I like the way you&#039;re integrating the creator and the destroyer (and making it clear that this doesn&#039;t recommend or excuse abuse). 
I&#039;m intereted in your ban on cruelty. One one level I completly agree - full stop. 
But - perhaps &#039;cruelty&#039; isn&#039;t the right word here - doesn&#039;t it happen in good relationships which remain hot that the partners will &#039;bite&#039; each other now and then? This causes a relatively uncommon modicum of sharp pain which leads to reparation and deepening of the rel. (My own proviso - I am not advocating relationships which are characterised by game-playing and mind games; although some people seem to like these.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evan &#8211; I like the way you&#8217;re integrating the creator and the destroyer (and making it clear that this doesn&#8217;t recommend or excuse abuse).<br />
I&#8217;m intereted in your ban on cruelty. One one level I completly agree &#8211; full stop.<br />
But &#8211; perhaps &#8216;cruelty&#8217; isn&#8217;t the right word here &#8211; doesn&#8217;t it happen in good relationships which remain hot that the partners will &#8216;bite&#8217; each other now and then? This causes a relatively uncommon modicum of sharp pain which leads to reparation and deepening of the rel. (My own proviso &#8211; I am not advocating relationships which are characterised by game-playing and mind games; although some people seem to like these.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

